Image editing, part II...
Two things I wanted to follow up on from yesterdays post.
First, Marion had a great question:
"I calibrate my monitor! My monitor id darker and bluer when I am finished. However, when I send pictures to others who do not calibrate, they complain that my pictures are too bright or too yellow. It is very frustrating to get negative comments when I know I am doing the right thing. What do you do about this?"
Great question, many photographers will include a "disclaimer" similar to this as part of the gallery link email they send to their client:
Please note: All of the images in your gallery have been processed and edited on a color corrected and calibrated monitor to ensure true, accurate representation of both color and light.
If the images appear too bright, too dark, or the color just seems "off" chances are very good that you are viewing these images on an un-calibrated computer monitor.
All prints made will be representative of the image as it accurately appears.
Including this disclaimer (or one like it) may stop a few of the "why does my picture look funny?" emails.
All are certainly welcome to use this disclaimer if they like (no need to reinvent the wheel).
Second, if you are interested in learning more about monitor calibration DataColor is presenting a free webinar “Monitor Calibration & More” on October 4th.
Not only will the one hour seminar cover the whys and hows of calibrating all kinds of monitors and you will also have the opportunity to win a Spyder3 Elite.
Image editing with your eyes closed…
Be warned, I am about to get on my soapbox.
Every once and awhile I have the "desire" to reinforce the need for and importance of monitor calibration (usually after a conversation with someone who "poo poo's" its significance).
Monitor calibration is not sexy (heck, it's not even fun), it's mere mention causes peoples eyes glaze over and they start looking for the nearest exit (or the closest ledge from which to jump).
But it's such an important part of photography workflow that if you ignore it, your images will be less than they could be.
So... if you would be happy with Stevie Wonder editing your images you can stop reading right here, otherwise please read on.
Here are several educational/informational resources to check out:
1. Earle Christie gave a very informative presentation/Q&A at the Maine Photographer Coalition and an online article he wrote on the subject "Predictable Color" is a must read.
2. If you want to delve even deeper into the subject then head over to Digital Dog, you'll find many great articles on calibration, calibration tools, and profiles.
3. My take on monitor calibration (back to Stevie) - if you are editing your images on an un-calibrated monitor it's like putting on rose colored glasses before you start image editing, which makes it a huge exercise in futility, because I don't know anybody who can make precise (and accurate) color corrections and adjustments when they're not even looking at the real colors!
There are a handful of really good tools out there to help you calibrate your monitor and after looking at the different options I settled on what I think is the best and easiest calibration tools available, the Spyder3Elite from DataColor.
I could ramble on about why I like this product more than any other, but you can take a quick tour of it here and see how it would fit into your workflow.
If you think I am overstating the importance of monitor calibration then don't take my word for it, take the word of someone many believe to be one of the finest photographers of our day, Vincent Versace.
Below is an audio excerpt from an interview he did with PopPhoto.com, and is his response to the question about the importance of calibrating your monitor (it's only 4 minutes long and worth every second of listening):
Vincent Versace on monitor calibration
Okay, move away, I am about to step down from my soapbox now.
One quarter of a million...
That's what my new rate is for shooting a wedding...
;)
Okay, back to reality, this past weekend we passed two hundred and fifty thousand views on the Weekly Photo Tips YouTube channel!
That is (in my simple mind) a bunch of views, and certainly not something I did all by myself.
I have a few folks I would like to (need to) thank for hitting this milestone.
First, I need to thank those who are generous enough to send us their products for review. I am sure they are inundated by review requests and I feel privileged that they select us to receive their products.
Second, I need to thank my friend Mark Hensley who is the driving force behind the production of our videos, and if you don't think "production" is a very important aspect, just go check out my very first video review (that I did all by myself) and you'll be sending Mark thank you emails as well. Be warned, if you do go to watch that video don't be surprised if you are
suddenly overcome with hysterical laughter, waves of nausea, or both.
Third (and last), I need to thank you, our loyal readers and viewers. If not for you I would be sitting here talking to myself. Your being a part of this is more appreciated than I can express in words.
Thank you all for making Weekly Photo Tips on YouTube what it is.
Weddings and high ISO...
I love what the newer cameras and their crazy high ISO abilities allow us to capture.
This image was shot in a relatively dark church and only with available light.
And as much as I love shooting weddings there are just three weeks left in this wedding season (for me) and I am looking forward to its end.
Photographing fall foliage...
Well (sadly), it's the first day of fall and Bing just came out with their list of the best places to shoot fall foliage.
It was nice to see that many of their selections are here in the northeast.
The weather channel has put together both national and regional maps tracking peak foliage.
Here is a list of state by state fall foliage links, tips, and videos, so you can check on the best shooting opportunities close to where you live:
AL - AR - CA - CO - CT - DE - GA - ID - IL - IN - IA - ME - MD - MA - MI - MN - MO - NH - NJ - NY - NC -OH - OK - OR - PA - RI - SC - TN - VT - VA - WA - WV - WI
Below is a Q&A on shooting fall foliage (and is part one of a four part series, so you here is part two, three, and four), enjoy.
It's baaaaaaack....
I know, I know, we just posted info this special offer a few weeks back (and this will be the third time in 2011), but as we are always picking up new readers and subscribers they may not have been "around" last time we posted it.
And those who have seen it before may be interested in seeing it again as well, for me personally every time this special comes up I buy it, that's why I (and my relatives) have so many canvases hanging in our homes.
So here it is again, Groupon is offering this great deal, a 16" x 20" gallery wrap from Canvas on Demand for just $45 (it even includes free shipping).
There has been more than one post here about why I LOVE Canvas on Demand so much (and have them all over my house) and why I recommend them so highly (you can read some of those posts here, here, and here).
The normal price for a canvas this size is $127, so the price of $45 is a 65% savings (and a far better price than I can get even with my pro account).
As of this writing you have just 30 hours to purchase your canvas.
DIY snoot from David Hobby's "Lighting in Layers"...
Not that long ago we reviewed the DVD set "Lighting in Layers" from David Hobby (aka Strobist).
One of the (many) cool things we did not include in the review was this DIY snoot made from a pasta box.
It's quick, simple, and very inexpensive. And it's very modifiable!
But this is the last "nugget" we are going to reveal from "Lighting in Layers", you will need to buy the DVD's, it's just $159 (or download for $99) to see the rest.
So here is the video, those who do not get the video with their feed need to return to the blog or head over to our YouTube channel to watch it.
I should have posted this yesterday...
As part of yesterdays book review "The Wedding Photography Field Guide" by Michelle Turner I meant (but forgot) to include an interview she did with Ibarionex Perello over at The Candid Frame.
So here is the link to the interview, enjoy.
Review of "The Wedding Photography Field Guide"...
Today I am reviewing the book "The Wedding Photography Field Guide" from my friend
Michelle Turner.
In the book Michelle plays to her strengths, she speaks about what she knows (and knows so well) and doesn't try to be all things to all people.
Michelle shares with you what has made her the successful wedding photographer she is, meaning she tells you what she uses and why she uses it in a thoughtful informative way. Sometimes (too often) authors will try to cover everything on a given subject, moving outside the realm of the personal "hands-on" knowledge and experience in an effort to give you "more".
In "The Wedding Photography Field Guide" you get rock solid knowledge acquired through years of experience.
The book starts out with gear: lenses, cameras, memory, computers, software, etc., if it's needed for wedding photography, it's covered. And I love how its presented, in the style of "this is what I do and this is why I do it this way".
RAW vs. .JPG, she doesn't tell you which to shoot, she tells you why RAW is her choice format if she's shooting a wedding in England or her daughters soccer game at home.
Michelle takes a couple pages just to explain why she shoots Aperture Priority at a wedding (fast changes in lighting, soft focus, etc.) and then how exposure compensation allows her to quickly adjust between shooting the bride (lots of white) and the groom (lots of dark clothing).
Once gear has been covered the book moves into environmental portraits and posing, covered more thoroughly than I have seen before (shadows, elements and patterns, leading lines, reflections, etc.), placing the couple in the frame, perspective, action, and interaction.
There are a ton of beautiful images in this book, which is not that uncommon for photography books, but what is different is that Michelle has a commentary for each one of them, the rationale behind why she took the shot, what made her click the shutter at that very moment.
You will find subjects not usually covered as well, like how to artistically capture flair in your image, how about fireworks, or a silhouette at sunset, all covered in detail with stunning example images.
Once you get to page 62 much of the rest of the book is like second shooting with Michelle, you'll go with her to shoot three different engagement sessions and seven different weddings.
There is so much more that is covered (like photographing toasts, the first dance, cutting the cake, or post production, proofing, and blogging), but I will leave those for you to read when you get the book.
And get "The Wedding Photography Field Guide" you should, because it's the best book on wedding photography I have read and you can get it for under $12 at Amazon.
In closing I want to say that in the interest of full disclosure that Michelle and I are friends, but that in no way influenced this review. I would never try to "pull a fast one" by slipping in a review for a friend and run the risk of ruining the credibility and trust it has taken me years to earn with you my readers.
I posted this review because this is an outstanding book and it has much to offer. Period.
A bad exposure doesn't mean a bad picture...
Well, I think it's a good picture, but then again I could be a little biased.
But my point is this, are we really shooting for the "perfect" exposure every time? Or are we shooting for an image the evokes an emotion, that "speaks" to us and to our clients?
There are many situations when we can "nail" the exposure, and we should, but I think this image is a great example of the impossibility of getting it perfect.
If I exposed for the bottom half of the dress (which is blown out), the top half of the dress would be way too dark (essentially I would have ended up with a picture of half of a dress and nothing else).
If I exposed for the interior of the church (which was as dark as a cave), the bride would be so blown out she would simply be a big white blotch.
What I went for was getting as much of the bride as I could and all else be damned.
When I first got into photography... oh how I would go crazy when taking an outdoor shot and trying to preserve detail in the sky and my subject at the same time, then it (finally) dawned on me one day, "does the client really care what the sky looks like in this senior portrait?".
It was then that I started asking myself better and smarter questions, what's the subject of my shot? What's important to my client? What do they want to see?
So when my bride sees this picture will she be disappointed with the blown out area of her dress? Will she wonder why the inside of the church is so dark?
Or will she smile because I captured the feeling of her walking through the door of the church and was able to bring her back to that moment of that day?
That's my 2 cents on exposure, I would love to hear yours, so please take the time to write a comment and share your thoughts.
And the winning continues...
Here are the results of our quick little contest.
Folks had to identify what movie the quote "I am a bit behind my time", it is from the movie (play and book) "A Christmas Carol". It was said by Bob Cratchit when he apologizes for coming in late the day after Christmas. "I was making rather merry...".
Two people were drawn form the correct entries and the winners are... Janet and Moria!
Janet will get a set of the "Strobist Lighting Cards" (you can read our review of them here).
Moria will get a set of the "Chase Jarvis: The Portrait Sessions Vol. 1" cards (our review is here).
The winners will need to send me an email with their snail mail address and we will get the prizes right out to them.
Congratulations!
September 11th...
I have always loved this image, it was sent in by reader Mark Pellegrino as part of a contest in 2008.
Clicking on the image will open it larger and in a new window for better viewing.
September 11 2001 as seen from space...
This image was taken from the international space station on September 11, 2001.
Smoke can clearly be seen billowing across the sky.
Our food contest winner is...
Two things...
First, sorry, I really did want to post this earlier in the day but "I am a bit behind my time".
Second, be sure to read to the very end of this post (you'll be mad if you don't).
Now, to the task at hand, announcing the winner.
As always, a big thank you to everyone who took the time to participate in this contest, a bunch of people left comments, joined our Flickr group, and uploaded some outstanding images.
Be sure to check out the Weekly Photo Tips Flickr page as our readers really do upload some inspirational work
The winner of our "Food" image contest, as always, was randomly selected from all who entered using a program called "The Hat", the person who will get a copy of the book "Food Photography" by Nicole Young is....
Drum roll please...
(Flickr name) AJones14!!!!
Here are a few of the images he uploaded for the contest:
So AJones14, drop me a note with your snail mail and we'll get the book right out to you.
Because I had to make you wait I want to sweeten the pot just a bit, if you drop me an email and tell me what movie (my absolute favorite movie in the world) the quote "I am a bit behind my time" came from I will send you a little somthin' somthin' (though I am not sure what just yet).
PLEASE, don't cheat by doing a word search.
I will throw all the correct answers into a pot and announce this winner on Tuesday, September 13th (oh no, Tuesday the 13th!).
So there isn't much time so email your answer soon.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)